Terminas cada módulo listo para el lunes

Cada fase de cada módulo — reto, contenido, escenario, plan de sesión, reflexión — adaptada a tu sector, tu centro, tus alumnos y tu experiencia. Construida durante el curso, no después. Técnicas de Formación en Taller disponible ahora. Soldadura, electricidad, automoción, climatización, robótica, solar y domótica inteligente: próximamente.

Get early access — it's free

Early access · Module 1 now, M2–5 weekly (Days 7/14/21/28) · No credit card

Ya has hecho formación continua que no cambió nada en tu taller. Esta está construida diferente — ve exactamente cómo más abajo.

EL MÉTODO MESTER

Cada 90 minutos sigue la misma estructura — hay un motivo

Un marco de aprendizaje aplicado para profesores técnicos de FP. Cada módulo sigue la misma estructura — ~90 minutos, seis fases — construido sobre práctica de recuperación, práctica basada en escenarios y transferencia reflexiva.

El Método
—
selecciona
01 / 06

Selecciona una fase del ciclo para ver los detalles.

Fases 1–3: Aprendizaje activo Fases 4–6: Práctica + Reflexión
🔁
Práctica de recuperación
La fase Verifica fuerza el recuerdo antes del refuerzo — el mecanismo con mayor tamaño de efecto en ciencias del aprendizaje (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006).
⚡
Aplicación deliberada
La fase Simula te sitúa en escenarios de tu propio taller de FP — no ejemplos genéricos. La práctica cobra sentido cuando refleja decisiones reales (Ericsson, 1993).
↗
Transferencia reflexiva
La fase Reflexiona crea evidencia de pensamiento antes/después — el paso crítico que convierte la formación en comportamiento en el taller (Schon, 1983).
Trainer using AI feedback
CÓMO FUNCIONA

Feedback que responde a lo que escribiste de verdad

En tres fases, el feedback que recibes responde a lo que realmente escribiste — tus decisiones en el escenario, tu plan de sesión, tu reflexión. No una puntuación. Una respuesta específica a tu contenido — no una lista genérica. Lo recibes con tu borrador todavía abierto, para que puedas revisar antes de terminar.

AI

Tu trabajo es tuyo. Procesamos tus respuestas solo para generar feedback — nada más. Cumple con el RGPD.

FASE 4 — VISTA PREVIA DE SIMULACIÓN

Practica en tu propio contexto, no en el aula de otro

No es un caso de estudio. Aparece un escenario ambientado en tu contexto real de formación — tu sector, tus alumnos, tus condiciones. Las consecuencias son realistas y responden a tus decisiones.

Pick a course sector — preview how its scenario and session plan look.
app.mester.academy/courses/assessment/module-1/scenario
Challenge
Insight
Check
Simulate
Create
Reflect

Elige tu sector. Te mostraremos exactamente cómo funciona en tu contexto de formación.

Este es un ejemplo de soldadura. Elige tu sector arriba para ver el tuyo.

LO QUE TE LLEVAS DE CADA MÓDULO

Con lo que realmente sales

Estos materiales se producen dentro de la plataforma — el formador escribe, decide y refina en cada paso. Todo se exporta como PDF. Este ejemplo es del curso de Evaluación.

Los 5 se generan a partir del mismo objetivo de aprendizaje — así que tu rúbrica, ficha y cuestionario evalúan exactamente lo que enseña tu plan de sesión.

📋
Plan de sesión
El plan de sesión que escribiste y refinaste — estructurado, descargable, listo para tu próxima clase.
📝
Ficha de trabajo
Ejercicios prácticos adaptados a tu tema, sector y nivel — para usar con tus alumnos.
✅
Cuestionario
20 preguntas en distintos niveles de Bloom — recuerdo, aplicación y evaluación.
📊
Rúbrica
Rúbrica de evaluación con 4 niveles de competencia — lista para usar en tu próxima sesión de taller.
📑
Esquema de presentación
Esquema didáctico con puntos clave y preguntas de debate por objetivo de aprendizaje.

Session Plan output — for the sector you picked above

Showing session plan for: Electrical Installation Change sector ↑
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
Circuit Protection & RCD Testing
Electrical Installation · Module 3 of 5
EQF Level
4–5

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Apply a structured fault-finding sequence to a domestic RCD nuisance-trip scenario using IET Wiring Regulations (18th Ed.) and BS 7671.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
OBD-II Diagnostics & DTC Interpretation
Automotive Technology · Module 2 of 5
EQF Level
3–4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Apply a manufacturer diagnostic flowchart to an engine management fault (P0301 misfire) using ISO 15031 / SAE J1979 OBD-II protocols.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
PLC Fault Diagnosis & Safety Circuit Reset
Industrial Automation · Module 4 of 5
EQF Level
4–5

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Apply ISO 14118 lockout-tagout procedure before investigating safety relay diagnostics on a Category 3 PLd two-hand control circuit (per ISO 13849 / IEC 62061).

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
Network Segmentation & VLAN Design
Digital Skills / IT · Module 2 of 5
EQF Level
4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Design a VLAN segmentation plan applying principle of least privilege to inter-VLAN routing (IEEE 802.1Q) to prevent lateral movement after an SME ransomware incident.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
Refrigerant Handling & F-Gas Compliance
HVAC & Refrigeration · Module 3 of 5
EQF Level
4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Apply EU F-Gas Regulation (517/2014) procedures for refrigerant recovery on R-410A and R-32 systems, completing a Category I logbook entry meeting Reg. (EU) 2015/2066 audit requirements.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
KNX Bus Commissioning & Group Addressing
Smart Building / BMS · Module 2 of 5
EQF Level
4–5

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Configure a KNX TP installation using ETS6 software (individual addresses, group addresses, KNX Association Table) and document handover to EN 50090 / ISO 16484-3 traceability standard.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan Live in early access
Designing Criterion-Referenced Assessment
Workshop Training · Module 3 of 5
Duration
55 min
+15 min prep
Before the session · 15 min
  • Read: one assessment brief from a course you currently teach — bring it to the session
  • Skim: Black & Wiliam (1998), Inside the Black Box — pp. 7–13 on criterion-referenced framing
  • Note: one criterion you've used that didn't discriminate between learners well
Learning Objectives
  • Write assessment criteria at EQF Levels 3–5 using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl 2001) — distinguishing knowledge, comprehension and application descriptors
  • Align a rubric to occupational standards using the ECVET credit-point framework and unit-of-learning-outcome structure
  • Apply the SOLO taxonomy (Biggs & Collis 1982) to identify surface vs. deep learning in learner-produced evidence
  • Diagnose criteria for inter-rater reliability problems using Wolf's (1995) competence-based assessment frame
  • Adapt criterion descriptors for ACNEAE / EHCP / GOK learners without compromising threshold standard
Activity Sequence
TimeActivityPedagogical rationale
0–8 minRetrieval: sort 12 verbs onto Bloom's Revised Taxonomy levels 1–6 from memoryPairs. Activates prior knowledge before introducing new framework. Common misconceptions surfaced: "understand" vs. "apply"; "evaluate" vs. "create" (Roediger & Karpicke 2006 testing effect).
8–15 minDirect instruction: ECVET unit-of-learning-outcome structure — the four mandatory components (knowledge, skills, autonomy, responsibility)Worked example projected. The "autonomy & responsibility" column is where most criteria fail at EQF 4–5.
15–30 minWorkshop: rewrite 3 weak assessment criteria using ECVET structure + Bloom's L3–4 descriptorsGroups of 3. Provided: 3 anonymised criteria from real NQF submissions that failed verification. Each group justifies their rewrite against the threshold standard.
30–42 minSOLO taxonomy application: grade 4 learner evidence samples (multistructural vs. relational vs. extended abstract)Individual, then compare with paired discussion. Builds inter-rater reliability practice. Pass/merit boundary discussion exposes implicit standard-setting heuristics (Mahony 2014).
42–52 minBuild one criterion for your own course: write Developing / Proficient / Distinction descriptorsSolo. Uses the assessment brief you brought from prep. The output is auditable evidence for whoever quality-assures your assessment.
52–55 minExit ticket + commitment: which criterion will you use in the next 7 days?Closure. Specific behavioural commitment increases transfer (Gollwitzer 1999 implementation intentions). Trainer feedback returned within 48h.
Differentiation note

For learners with ACNEAE / EHCP / GOK provision: the criterion threshold does not move — the route of evidence does. The session provides three alternative evidence formats (oral assessment, observed practical with scribe, portfolio compilation over time) that preserve the standard while accommodating access requirements.

Assessment rubric
Criterion writing (Bloom's)
Developing
Vague verbs; no observable behaviour; level cannot be triangulated
Proficient
Observable verb + performance context at correct Bloom's level
Distinction
Correct + aligned to ECVET unit + cross-referenced to standard clause
SOLO taxonomy grading
Developing
Grades by volume of content, not structural complexity
Proficient
Correctly distinguishes multistructural from relational in all 4 samples
Distinction
Correct + articulates why extended abstract is rarely achievable at L3
Threshold standard preservation
Developing
Drops standard for SEND learners ("make it easier")
Proficient
Adjusts route of evidence; threshold stays
Distinction
As Proficient + documents reasonable adjustments traceable to JCQ access arrangements
Workshop transfer
Developing
Names a generic commitment ("I'll try better criteria")
Proficient
Names specific criterion + specific cohort + 7-day timeline
Distinction
As Proficient + names the evidence they'll inspect to confirm uptake
Apply in your workshop · next 7 days

Use the criterion you drafted in Activity 5 with a real learner cohort this week. Two minutes' reflection captured in the platform after — what happened, what didn't, what you'd change.

Module 4 opens with your reflections feeding the next discussion. This module isn't done until the criterion has met a real learner.

Methodology

This module is structured from established assessment-design frameworks rather than original pedagogical research. References below are the published standards the rubric is mapped against — not endorsements from those bodies.

Mapped against: Bloom 2001 (Anderson & Krathwohl) · ECVET unit-of-learning-outcome structure · SOLO taxonomy (Biggs & Collis 1982) · your national access arrangements (JCQ in GB, the SEC/RACE scheme in IE, passend onderwijs in NL)

spec_version: WT-M3-r1.0 · Last review: May 2026 · Next review: November 2026

External peer-review panel: forming. We are inviting credentialled VET assessors (TAQA / CAVA / kwalificatiedossier-pool reviewers) to validate the rubric against awarding-body standards by Q1 2027 (Module 3's first renewal cycle). Contact us if you want to be invited.

Preview the artefact

The actual rubric you'd use Monday morning — 4 criteria × 3 levels with anchor exemplars per cell (welding, electrical, refrigeration, hairdressing). Plus the 15-min peer-moderation protocol.

Download PDF →
You walk out with
  • Bloom's Revised Taxonomy verb bank (152 verbs mapped to all 6 levels)
  • ECVET unit-of-learning-outcome template (printable, fillable PDF)
  • SOLO grading guide with 4 annotated evidence samples (Levels 3, 4, 5)
  • access-arrangements quick-reference card
  • 15-min peer-moderation A4 protocol (downloadable above)
  • One auditable criterion for your own course, returned with trainer feedback within 48h
Contributes to Open Badge 3.0 · Pedagogy Assessment Pathway (Module 3 of 5) EQF Level 4–5
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
Cost Accounting & Contribution Margin Analysis
Business & Finance · Module 3 of 5
EQF Level
4–5

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Calculate contribution margin per unit and break-even point for a manufacturing SME using Deckungsbeitragsrechnung, then interpret a UGB/HGB P&L to identify three EBIT levers without increasing revenue.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
Setting Out & Tolerances for Masonry Structures
Construction & Built Environment · Module 2 of 5
EQF Level
3–4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Apply BS 8000-3:2001 workmanship tolerances to set out a cavity wall return, then document a non-conformance and corrective action under BS EN 1996-2 (Eurocode 6) using the CITB site diary format.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
MIG Weld Quality Assessment & Defect Classification
Welding & Metal Fabrication · Module 3 of 5
EQF Level
3–4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Classify MIG weld discontinuities against BS EN ISO 5817:2023 quality levels B, C and D, then complete a non-conformance report meeting BS EN ISO 3834-3 Level C quality management requirements.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request
Session Plan · Teaser Ships Sept 2026
PV System Sizing & IEC 62446-1 Commissioning Documentation
Renewable Energy / Solar PV · Module 2 of 4
EQF Level
3–4

When this sector ships, each session plan arrives with the structure you can preview in the Workshop Training card — pre-session prep, 5 learning objectives, 6 activities with pedagogical rationale, access-arrangement-aligned differentiation, 4×3 rubric with anchor exemplars, downloadable artefact PDF, and a peer-moderation protocol.

One learning outcome from this module

Size a grid-connected PV system against EU RED II (2018/2001) performance targets, then complete an IEC 62446-1:2016 initial verification report for a 10 kWp residential installation.

Get early access → Draft outline · last updated May 2026 · build log on request

Each module checked against the current edition of the relevant occupational standard before publication.

¿Cómo serían los tuyos?

Escribe tu tema y tu email — tu ejercicio, cuestionario y rúbrica de ejemplo estarán en tu bandeja en menos de un minuto.

Gratuito — sin cuenta · Cumple RGPD

El ciclo es la estructura. Lo que sigue, lo vives en el módulo.
Cada fase tiene un motivo. La página del método te muestra qué ocurre realmente — y por qué.
Las 6 fases: fundamentos y ejemplos →
Trainers in collegial discussion
APRENDIZAJE EN EQUIPO

Una rúbrica. Dos formadores. Una conversación de 30 minutos que mejora las dos.

Después de completar un módulo, dos profesores de FP llevan sus rúbricas a la reunión de departamento. Uno ponderó los criterios de seguridad al 40%, el otro al 25%. Esa diferencia se convierte en una conversación de 30 minutos que mejora ambas rúbricas. Para eso está diseñado este curso — preparación individual que hace el trabajo en equipo más concreto. Ejemplo ilustrativo. Mester prepara los materiales; la conversación ocurre con tu equipo. ¿Sin sesión de coordinación programada? La rúbrica sigue siendo útil — como herramienta de reflexión individual a la que volver después de la clase.

No single author

Content synthesized from national and European occupational standards, live industry specifications, and practitioner knowledge across 11 sectors — structured for VET classroom delivery and updated when the field moves.

Standard-checked

Each module checked against the current edition of the relevant occupational standard before publication.

Coverage by course

Coverage and depth vary by course and country — pick a course sector above to see which standards and frameworks are included, or read how the content is built →

Tu plan de sesión del lunes empieza aquí.

Early access opens Module 1 free. If you join early access, Modules 2–5 unlock weekly (Days 7, 14, 21, 28) — in exchange for honest feedback that shapes the product. Early access stays free for the full cohort journey; withdraw anytime.

Get early access — it's free

Your access link is sent automatically as soon as you sign up.